How ISO/IEC 42006 Helps Companies Manage AI Model Risks?
Introduction
AI is moving into decisions that affect customers, patients, money and safety. Many companies now run multiple models across business units using shared data platforms, third-party tools and fast release cycles. This growth creates real risk. Model drift, hidden bias, weak validation, unclear accountability and poor monitoring can damage trust and invite regulatory attention.
ISO/IEC 42006 sits in the ecosystem that supports ISO/IEC 42001. While ISO/IEC 42001 focuses on how organizations build and run an AI management system, ISO/IEC 42006 is aimed at how certification bodies and auditors should be competent and consistent when assessing that system. This matters because strong, consistent audits push organizations to treat AI model risk as a controlled operational discipline, not a policy statement.
If your organization wants to verify AI governance readiness or plan for ISO/IEC 42001 certification with a clear view of audit expectations, you can request an audit plan from Pacific Certifications to review scope, timelines and evidence requirements.
Quick summary
ISO/IEC 42006 supports trustworthy AI certification by setting expectations for the competence and consistency of bodies that audit and certify AI management systems. For companies, this helps reduce uncertainty around what “good” AI governance looks like in practice. It indirectly strengthens AI model risk control by encouraging clearer audit criteria for model lifecycle management, data governance, monitoring, incident handling and continuous improvement.
Why ISO/IEC 42006 matters for AI model risk?
Many AI teams can build models quickly but struggle to prove ongoing control once systems scale. Different departments may use different validation methods, different monitoring thresholds and different documentation standards. This leads to uneven risk control and weak organizational oversight.
ISO/IEC 42006 helps address this gap by raising the maturity of AI audits. When certification bodies follow a consistent competence and assessment framework, companies receive clearer expectations and more reliable findings. This drives better internal alignment across data science, product, security, privacy, risk and legal. In simple terms, ISO/IEC 42006 helps make AI certification meaningful. It supports audits that test real-world model controls and decision governance rather than checking only high-level documents.
What are the requirements for ISO/IEC 42006?
ISO/IEC 42006 is not a company-facing implementation standard in the same way as ISO/IEC 42001. It is built to guide certification bodies. Still, companies benefit by understanding the areas auditors are likely to scrutinize more consistently because of it. We can expect emphasis on:
- Clear definition of AIMS scope and boundaries during certification.
- Auditor competence in AI concepts, model lifecycle, data risk and AI-specific impacts.
- Consistent audit methods for evaluating AI governance and technical evidence.
- Strong understanding of AI risk and impact assessment approaches.
- Review of transparency and traceability evidence tied to AI decisions.
- Consistent grading of nonconformities in AI governance contexts.
- Clear expectations for management review and improvement within an AI management system.
Tip: Treat these themes as a preview of how serious AIMS audits will look. This helps you prepare internal evidence in a structured way.
How to prepare for ISO/IEC 42006-aligned expectations?
Even though ISO/IEC 42006 targets certification bodies, companies can prepare for its downstream impact by strengthening how they present and control AI model risk inside ISO/IEC 42001. Refer to the points below:
- Build a complete AI inventory that includes purpose, owners, data sources, model versions and risk level.
- Define model lifecycle rules that cover development, validation, approval, deployment, monitoring and retirement.
- Standardize risk and impact assessments across teams so high-impact models get deeper controls.
- Create consistent documentation templates for training data, testing results, limitations and intended use.
- Run internal reviews that simulate what external auditors will sample.
- Ensure leadership receives periodic reports on AI risks, performance and improvement progress.
Certification audit
Stage 1 audit: Review of AIMS scope, AI inventory, AI policy and objectives, risk and impact assessment approach, data and model governance structure, internal audit and management review readiness.
Stage 2 audit: Verification of implementation across selected AI use cases, including model lifecycle controls, validation evidence, monitoring records, change management, incident handling and cross-functional accountability.
Nonconformities: Must be corrected with documented root causes, updated controls, improved records and evidence that changes are applied and sustained.
Surveillance audits: Conducted annually to confirm that AI governance, model monitoring and improvement activities remain active as AI use expands.
Recertification audits: Required every three years to review the full AIMS, new AI systems, major model changes and evolving risk context.
What are the benefits of ISO/IEC 42006 for companies?
ISO/IEC 42006 strengthens the value of AI certification by improving audit consistency and competence. Below are key benefits:
- Clearer audit expectations for AI model risk control across business units.
- More consistent evaluation of model lifecycle evidence.
- Better alignment between technical teams and governance teams due to shared audit language.
- Stronger confidence for customers and partners in AI certificates and scope statements.
- Reduced risk of superficial AI audits that miss real operational gaps.
- Higher quality nonconformity findings that support meaningful corrective actions.
- Better long-term improvement of AI governance over the three-year certification cycle.
Market Trends
AI governance is transitioning from principles to measurable control frameworks. As more companies adopt ISO/IEC 42001, the market will demand consistent certification practices. This makes supporting standards like ISO/IEC 42006 more important because they shape how auditors interpret evidence across industries.
In the coming years, AI audits are likely to place more weight on model monitoring, lifecycle traceability, data governance and accountability for high-impact use cases. Companies that prepare early will find it easier to demonstrate control without slowing innovation.
Training and courses
Pacific Certifications provide accredited training programs aligned with AI governance and audit expectations:
- Lead Auditor Training: For professionals evaluating AI governance, risk and impact assessment, model controls and monitoring evidence.
- Lead Implementer Training: For teams establishing or strengthening an Artificial Intelligence Management System across business units.
For ISO/IEC 42001 and AI governance training aligned with your AI use cases, contact [email protected].
How Pacific Certifications can help?
Pacific Certifications provides accredited audit and certification services for AI management systems. We assess AIMS scope, AI inventories, risk and impact assessments, data governance, model lifecycle controls, monitoring, incident handling, internal audits and management reviews.
To request an ISO/IEC 42001 audit plan and understand how ISO/IEC 42006-driven audit expectations may shape evidence and scope, contact [email protected] or visit www.pacificcert.com.
Ready to get ISO/IEC 42006 certified?
Contact Pacific Certifications to begin your certification journey today!
Author: Alina Ansari
Suggested Certifications –
Read more: Pacific Blogs
